|
Hardware architecture
The onboard controller is a distributed hierarchical system
comprising a PC-based computer, a data-acquisition board and eight three-axis
control boards based on the LM629 microcontrollers, interconnected through an
ISA bus. The LM629 microcontrollers include digital PID filters provided with a
trajectory generator used to execute closed-loop control for position and
velocity in each joint. Every microcontroller commands a DC motor-joint driver
based on the PWM technique. An analog data-acquisition board is used to
acquire sensorial data from the range of external equipment (sensors, locators,
etc.). A radio Ethernet card is provided for network communication with the
operator station. Additional electronic cards for interfacing with the detector
are also provided, as well as communication with the DGPS systems via RS232. A
general diagram of the SILO6 hardware architecture is shown in Figure 3.

Figure3. Hardware architecture
Software architecture
The onboard computer is in charge of
the walking robot’s locomotion throughout a minefield. Therefore, a global
planning to guide the walking robot along a predefined path and some mine-search
algorithm are required. But also reactive locomotion is required so that the
robot is able to respond robustly to uncertain disturbances during task
execution. For this purpose a hybrid deliberative/reactive control architecture
based on three control levels is proposed for the SILO6 and is shown in Figure
4.

Figure 4. Control architecture
1. Basic Control Level
This layer is in charge
of coordinating the simultaneous motion of all six legs of the walking
robot to perform straight-line or circular trajectories. Based on
trajectory generation, all three joints in a leg are coordinated to
perform the required motions. Also, the five joints of the manipulator
are coordinated to perform trajectory following. Finally, the
individual joints for both the walking robot and its manipulator are
controlled through a dedicated microcontroller, which runs a PID
control algorithm.
2. Reactive Control Level
This layer is aimed to
add robustness to the control system. Based on sensor data (joint
positions and foot forces) the reactive control level helps to react
to unpredictable changes in the environment. Two reactive behaviors
have been considered for the walking robot controller:
2.1. Robot Attitude
Regulator: During locomotion any non-constant dynamics (at leg swing,
manipulation motion, when bumping against the environment) can disturb
robot stability. Such disturbances could be balanced by means of
posture regulation by using active compliance with stability
compensation.
2.2. Leg Obstacle
Avoidance: This behavior reacts when terrain obstacles interrupt leg
transfer trajectories. When a position error threshold is detected in
a leg motion the transfer trajectory is modified to enable the
obstacle avoidance (see
Video 1).
Two more reactive
modules have been designed for the manipulator’s motion:
2.3. Object-contour
tracer: This module moves the sensor head around an obstacle using
information from the bumper (see
video 2).
2.4.
Ground-surface tracer: This module keeps the detector head at a
constant distance from the ground, controlling its attitude as well (see
video 3).
3. Deliberative Control Level
The deliberative
control level is aimed to plan the robot motion. Three modules have
been considered for the walking robot’s motion planning:
3.1. Gait Generator:
This module generates the sequence of leg lifting and foot placement
to move the robot in a stable manner. Dynamic stability is guaranteed
by the stability module. The SILO6 gait generator will be based on
three gaits: straight gait, a spinning gait and a turning gait.
3.2. Gait Selector:
Based on user decision, if teleoperation is used, or based on sensor
data that determines the grade of terrain roughness, the Gait Selector
switches between three gaits, which are: a tripod gait (preferable for
even terrain), a discontinuous gait (preferable for quite uneven
terrain) and a free gait (for very uneven terrain with forbidden
areas).
3.3. Navigator: This
module generates on-line a complete-coverage trajectory based on the
Boustrophedon Cellular Decomposition. This method divides the
mine field into cells free of obstacles, so that each cell is
completely covered by the robot with back-and-forth
boustrophedon motions. To achieve complete coverage of an
unstructured environment like a minefield the cellular decomposition
is performed incrementally based on sensed obstacles. Also, to ensure
that the walking robot visits every cell in the mine
field, a connectivity graph is used.
Video
4
shows the robot’s trajectory in a minefield planned by the navigator
module.
The global planning of
the manipulator is performed by one deliberative module:
3.4. Sweep-Trajectory
Generator: This module computes the trajectory of the sensor head to
ensure complete coverage of the swept area. This is done by means of a
cross sweep, which is the most efficient way to scan for buried mines.
It avoids overlapping scanned areas while ensuring complete coverage.
The sensor head scans an area that covers the width of the walking
robot. This module coordinates the manipulator's motion with the
walking robot's velocity.

|
Figure 4.
Manipulator’s sweep trajectory (a) in the manipulator’s
reference frame (b) coordinated with walking robot’s velocity in
an external reference frame.

(a)

(b)
Figure 5.
A comparison of sweep motions: (a) crossed sweep (b) circular
sweep
In the near future…
-
To implement the
navigator in the silo6 robot some aspects have to be solved:
1.
Modify the incremental cell decomposition algorithm to
cope with the uncertainity of the sensor-based location system.
2.
Integrate manipulator and walking robot and use the
manipulator to sense critical points in the cellular
decomposition method.
·
To implement the posture
regulator in the SILO6 we need to measure foot forces. Due to
the high cost of six good triaxial force sensors, we are
considering to measure motor current instead.
|
|